Some earnest politicians seeking the Republican nomination to run for president in 2012 had a debate the other night. One could get a good idea of which way various news outlets lean by their headlines the next day. One had Ron Paul the winner, another had Pawlenty the victor, another had Santorum ahead and yet another had someone named Cain in first place. Someone for everyone opposed to the anointed one.
Does it matter who gains the nod to run against the incumbent?
Does it matter who wins in 2012?
Does it matter whether I step on the beetle crawling across my path?
I know; I know, the Butterfly Effect and all that.
I say: Hooey!
Let's face the sad fact that we are ruled by the invisible 1%. The multi-millionaires and billionaires who control the world's finances and who also control the politicians who - ostensibly - represent us and protect the constitution and determine the future direction of ou

r country according to the will of the people, blah, blah, blah.
It's quite a comedy. Like the mighty K. Vonnegut once said, The people who run for president are insane. Or, words to that effect. The same adjective can be applied to those who believe there is a material difference between any of the candidates for president regardless of party.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ talks
and
nobody walks

And after ten long years of lugging that kidney dialysis machine over the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan, avoiding detection by every intelligence apparatus in the world, Osama is finally laid to rest by Obama, or at least dumped in the sea , some sea they say, some sea not too far from the barren reaches of Pakistan. Our erstwhile representatives claim such burial is in accordance with Muslim custom, although after 1,400 or so years in the desert, Muslim custom (up until now at any rate) called for burial in the ground, facing East towards Mecca.
From my lips to God: When asked for proof of the kill an indignant government spokesman posited the possibly rhetorical question Do you think your government would fabricate such a story? There were photos of the now one eyed Osama, but they were too gruesome for the public to see, besides they might inflame Muslim terrorists around the world, not that killing their leader wouldn't.
And then, our same erstwhile leaders also claimed at various times that Osama was holding a gun and firing and he was also weaponless; he used his wife as a shield and he didn't; he was shot resisting and he was shot where he sat; there were orders to take him alive and orders to kill him on sight; our erstwhile leaders watched the action live on TV in the White House and Madam Secretary of State can be seen holding her hand across her mouth and gasping at the horror of it all, but wait, the actual attack was blacked out for 25 minutes with no broadcast of the actual shooting transmitted and Madam Secretary was actually suffering from allergies...and where have you gone Kurt Vonnegut...the exquisite joy you would have describing such historic events.
One may safely say that you could survive quite well without subjecting yourself to the insults, absurdities and outright lies of the daily news. I am willing to wager that doing so would have several positive side effects, e.g. lowering your blood pressure.
I am going to avoid all news reports via paper, audio and visual for an extended period and will report back with the results. In the meantime remember Ben Franklin's advice
: Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you see , or Twain's
Don't believe anything you hear and only half of what you read, or , my personal favorite the illiterate Italian firebrand Garibaldi's
Don't believe anything you hear or see.