Down through history, there have been countless acts of quiet courage - acts requiring a most difficult moral choice and the willful avoidance of taking the easy way out- of which we can hope to learn only in the next life. Our ignorance does not diminish their significance or the admiration we owe those who performed the acts. Sometimes, years after the fact, we gain a glimpse of such selfless deeds.
During the second world war, the Allied leaders demanded unconditional surrender. This policy resulted in many thousands of needless deaths on both sides. Many of their own military leaders and advisers counselled against such a policy, but the civilian leaders weren't the ones bleeding. They knew only vindictive hatred of the enemy.
This is especially regrettable as there was from 1942 on, a secret movement among many of Germany's military commanders to seek surrender and eliminate Hitler if the allies' demands were less than 'unconditional'.
Both Roosevelt and Churchill refused to even acknowledge such an underground movement existed and refused to allow American and British intelligence to contact or acknowledge such a movement.
Over 7000 German men and women involved with this effort were butchered by the Gestapo between 1942-1945, usually hung by piano wire and left to die a slow, painful death or shot summarily without an opportunity to bid farewell to loved ones.One, Claus von Stauffenberg ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claus_von_Stauffenberg ) is known to many thanks to his portrayal by Tom Cruise in the movie Valkyrie.
His motivation can be summed up in the last recorded words of a fellow conspirator who eluded the hangman's noose with a bullet to the brain.
"A man's moral worth is established only at the point where he is prepared to give his life for his convictions." General Henning von TresckowI was reminded of such quiet acts of courage the other night while watching a great "B" movie and classic film noire, Where the Sidewalk Ends http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Where_the_Sidewalk_Ends
The protagonist , played by Dana Andrews, is faced with a difficult moral choice at the end of the movie. While not deadly in its implications, the situation presents a choice between, on the one hand, being acknowledged a hero and winning the girl , and on the other, admitting to accidentally killing someone and going to prison and possibly losing the girl.
Today, his choice would be a simple one for our corrupt society to make, and his final action would generate guffaws from the ignorant among us.
Yet there was a time when such quiet acts of courage were not laughed at except by the evil ones, but applauded by everyday, morally aware people. I'd like to think there are enough such morally upright people left in our country. Perhaps the next election cycle will reveal whether we - us once great Americans - still have the stuff of greatness about us, the willingness to perform quiet acts of courage and choose the morally correct way, regardless of what sacrifice it entails.
We are where the sidewalk ends and beyond the curb yawns the great abyss, where lie all the collapsed great civilizations of the past moldering in moral decay.
Do we have the will...the energy...the moral courage to make that great leap of faith and avoid the abyss?





