Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The Wickedness of the Virtuous

The 'virtuous' among us would have you believe that the Fort Hood Muslim terrorist is to be sympathized with. He was suffering 'pre' tramatic stress syndrom; he was lonely; he was mistreated; all the facts are not in; he was the victim of prejudice; he was mentally ill and snapped; it had nothing to do with the latest Moorish invasion and holy war against the West, blah, blah, blah.

What rank stupidity, blindness, political correctness run wild.

To listen to the chattering heads on most of the network news shows would make one vomit. The exceptions are few and far between. I am next expecting the various Christian churches, including the American Catholic Church, to cry out for understanding and forgiveness and toleration of our Muslim brothers.

The Major is a terrorist. A Muslim terrorist killer. I am glad he survived. I look forward to the media circus that awaits. Will we get to the truth? How our military political correctness and the spineless political leaders that we have look the other way when it comes to Muslim fanatics? How they fear being labeled bigots if they dare stand against evil? I can hardly wait, although I won't hold my breath that the American public will ever learn the truth.

One piece of good news today. John Allen Muhammed, another evil Moor who wished the destruction of America and who demonstrated his evilness by sniper shooting and killing ten innocent people in the DC and Virginia area back in 1990, was executed this morning. Despite the howls of 'peace loving' mush brains who abhor capital punishment, (the virtuous among us), this Muslim terrorist , quite properly, was sent on his way to hell.

In a speech about the appeasers of the Nazis, Winston Churchill said, "The malice of the wicked is reinforced by the weakness of the virtuous."

Will America and its pathetic leaders learn this lesson before the lights go out?

1 comment:

  1. What is most puzzling to me about the reluctance to label the Major a terrorist is that doing so would protect "mainstream" Muslims in America from being thrown into the same category. A label of "terrorist" would marginalize him as merely one member of a small group of extremists who are not respected by the balance of the Muslim community. Terrorism would remain a neat and tidy category in which only a small percentage of Muslims would fit.

    But by insisting that this was not terrorism, the "virtuous" are implicitly stating that any and all of the millions of Muslims in America are just as likely as the Major to commit acts of violence like this. After all, he was well educated and had a very respectable job. He was not living in poverty in a cave in Afghanistan, ripe for extremist indoctrination.

    So in the end, I disagree with you. I think it is more accurate not to label this an act of terrorism that can easily be prevented by stamping out extremist groups throughout the world. No, it is something far worse.

    ReplyDelete